Conspiracy Edition

Normally, I stay off the conspiracy bus, especially the hard-core conspiracy bus. Conspiracies exist, ok, but contrived theories about September 11th being orchestrated by the CIA or ranting right wing radio stars, leave me shaking my head in wonderment. It’s like Fox-culture for fanatics.

Austin Powers

And since the sky is falling on the financial markets I think it’s time for a good conspiracy theory. There must be one on the near horizon. Financial markets are so globally intermingled, that the potential for active manipulation is growing obvious. The bond market has disposed of leaders in Italy, Greece and Ireland. Sequestered funds have supported uprisings in Libya.

In my youth, the world feared Hollywood, not Wall Street.

So if you’re guessing I’m going to point fingers at the Republicans, Congress, the Fed, the ECB, the IMF, the EFSF, or peripheral Europe, you’d be wrong. I admit those players are tempting targets. And though I was lead down that path given the flagrant corruption and self-interest, in the end I couldn’t point fingers at western politicians, for the following reasons:

  1. Conspiracies assume coordinated action
  2. An interest in a higher cause
  3. And a fair amount of intelligence

One problem with a conspiracy theory is that it’s interpreted, after the fact; 9/11, DSK, Roswell, WMD, Birthers, etc. Another problem with deconstructing a conspiracy is that it can/will be fully manipulated. Wall Street, the popular press, and politics are each positioning the story to his/her advantage. The Conspiracy has become The Story, therefore everything around it is fair game. Fine. That’s life, but what if we imagined the potential conspiracy of tomorrow by looking at the under-reported stories of today? Is there a major manipulation ‘en cours’, who’s holding back and why?

Today’s financial train wreck will be a player in my hypothetical future conspiracy but I don’t think today’s financial crisis will be The Story. It will be a major part of it, for sure, but today’s crisis has been more a comedy of errors; hardly intelligent coordination. The result of a self-serving private club that was/is getting richer and richer with little understanding of the power they hold in their hands. Now with that private club, coming under attack, we see signs of the broader impact of their arrogance. Who would have predicted Berlusconi’s resignation as a result of bond vigalantes? (I might predict his return when the bond vigalantes look elsewhere…) Few saw the housing collapse coming and that a loan in Poughkeepsie could bankrupt Iceland.

Some would say China has this figured out already, but I’d say only partially. Projecting influence is a relatively new game for China.

The impact of the markets on how the world functions impresses and scares me at the same time. Again, I think the time is ripe for some major manipulation. There is an ongoing conspiracy staring me in the face, I’m sure of it; so it’s my turn to contrive a theory.

The Black Swan has become a popular term, but I’m more interested in looking for something that’s sitting in front of me, not an outlier, so I extracted a few tidbits from the internet while searching for clues to a future event unknown to me, but known to someone. Obviously, more of an art than a science, and I’m doing this selfishly, for speculation (ironic?), and as a distraction…

I started looking at under-reported news, news that is swept under the carpet, misinterpreted, suspiciously left to die on the vine, or is largely ignored. This is my short list:

  1. Ron Paul
  2. Balanced analysis of the Middle East Iran and Israel
  3. Aljazeera
  4. Skrillex
  5. The Occupy Movement
  6. China, Myanmar, North Korea
  7. HFT
  8. Congressional Insider Trading
  9. Debt, Modern Finance, Market Behaviour
  10. Mars

That reads like a John Stewart brainstorm…

Might I find a future conspiracy by manipulating some of these subjects for some super-secret objective? If so what’s that objective and who’s doing the manipulating? Did someone conspire to unseat Berlusconi or was it just ‘the markets’? Either answer is scary and I’m reminded of a TED presentation on HFT but let’s assume it was ‘the market’. My guess is National Security Strategists (whoever they might be) are in a state of epiphany and studying the Italian case very closely.

We have a long history of trying to manipulate using ‘sanctions’ (through the UN as a proxy) against Iran, North Korea and Myanmar for example, but to support/manipulate other western countries through the manipulation of the bond market, that’s an eye opener. And what about Gold and the Venezualan repatriation? Chavez might be a paranoid megalomaniac but still, the only other example I found was Estonia in 1992.  The visibilities on American stockpiles are nearly non-existent and the falling confidence in fiat currencies, makes me wonder. Today for example the Bank of Korea increased it’s gold reserves by 39%, just this month. National Security Strategists pay attention.

Conspiracy theories related to monetary policy and investment bankers are recently very popular, much like fuckedcompany.com was during the internet bubble. I won’t add to that noise but if you’re interested in non-stop cynical commentary, ZH is a favorite place to read through a few.

So what might be the endgame here? To answer that question I think you need to answer the following: What elements of the financial markets are the easiest (least transparent) to manipulate as a proxy to meet a political objective?

  1. The Rating Agencies.
  2. The Federal Reserve Board. “The Fed” has a dual mandate described as a balance between price stability and full employement, and was established when congress passed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.
  3. The Press.

There are two innate or base political objectives; the first, re-election and the second, wealth. Both mini-conspiracies are played out as political theater in Russia, the US, and in Europe this very moment. Maybe it’s unfair to call them conspiracies, but we can hardly call them fair and honest democracy, money and the press play a far too biased role. And yet this noise is probably a good backdrop for a larger objective.

On the cusp of the latest round of EU summits S&P offered another round of coincidences by warning 15 countries of simultaneous downgrade.

 “These observations arrive completely at odds with events,” said Christian Noyer, president of the Banque de France. “A very politically motivated action,” huffed Ewald Nowotny, the central bank governor of Austria.

I find it hard to deny that closed door politics are influencing S&P’s timing.

More later…